THE MOSQUITO MAGNET® A NEW TOOL IN CONTROLLING TREE HOLE MOSQUITOES

 

BRIAN HOUGAARD and SAMMIE LEE DICKSON

Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District

Salt Lake City, UT  84116

 

 


Introduction

 

      The first tree hole mosquitoes, Ae. sierrensis, were collected in Salt Lake City in 1987. Since that time the problems with tree hole mosquitoes have drastically increased (Fig. 1).  Tree hole mosquitoes lay their eggs in holes, and rotted areas of trees that hold water.  Neighborhoods with older mature trees are most affected.  Although programs are in place to control tree hole mosquito larvae, it is almost impossible to find all sources.  For example, in densely forested areas such as along creek banks or where trees are wrapped with leafy vines, all sources cannot be found.  For this reason there will always be adult tree hole mosquitoes.  These mosquitoes are very aggressive which makes them a neighborhood nuisance.  Fortunately, the tree hole mosquito stays fairly close to their source area, which makes trapping them a viable control method effective.  The Mosquito Magnet®, a new type of mosquito trap, was used this year by the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District. The purpose for using the Mosquito Magnet® was to find out how effective it was in temporarily reducing tree hole mosquitoes in selected areas.

 

Materials and Methods

 

      The Mosquito Magnet® is a relatively new  mosquito trap.  It runs on liquid propane which is converted, through a catalytic reaction, into carbon dioxide and warm water vapor in similar proportions to that of human breath.  The reaction also creates a small electrical charge that runs the traps fans.  The trap uses a technology which is called a counter flow system (Fig. 2).  The counter flow works by putting a smaller tube, that blows out the attractant, inside of a larger tube that sucks the mosquitoes up into the trap.  Supposedly, mosquitoes have a tendency to reverse direction by flying up rather than down, this behavior brings them closer to the trap entrance.

 

      The Mosquito Magnet® was brought to, and ran in several different locations over the course of the summer.  Three main locations will be discussed in this paper.

 

1.   1166 Downington is the sight where the Mosquito Magnet® was used most.  There were large numbers of tree hole mosquitoes at this location.  The back yard bordered the banks of Emigration Creek.  The back yard area, as well as the banks of the creek had many mature trees.  To evaluate the effectiveness of the Mosquito Magnet® an ABC Pro® (American Biophysics Company) trap was also used at this location.  The ABC Proâ trap is very similar in design to a CDC trap.  It uses a thermal water jug filled with dry ice as its source of CO2.  Below the jug is the main body of the trap, which has some electronic components and a fan.  Below the body is the net.  It uses a 7 volt motorcycle battery as a power source. The trap works by releasing CO2 out the bottom of the jug.  As the mosquitoes come close to the attractant they are sucked down by the fan into the net.  It was set to run continuously day and night as the Mosquito Magnetâ does. 

 

      After the Mosquito Magnet® was run for several days, it was removed and replaced with the ABC Pro®  trap for one day and night.  The ABC Pro® trap was then removed and the Mosquito Magnet® was operated for several more days.  The two traps operated in the same location, but were never operating at the same time.

 

2.   1257 Gilmer Drive is in an older up scale neighborhood.  There were a number of large mature trees in the area. Some of the trees are wrapped with leafy vines making it hard to find all of the tree holes.  The mosquitoes at this house were numerous and the owner asked if the district could help.

 

3.   1709 Bryan Avenue was another location that bordered a creek.  It was also populated with many trees. The tree hole mosquitoes were not nearly as abundant here as at the Downington location.

 

Results and Discussion

 

      The Mosquito Magnet® was used more at 1166 Downington than at all other locations.  This area had the biggest tree hole mosquito problem because of the large number of trees.  Between June 11 and August 9 4,857 Ae. sierrensis were trapped at Downington.  Over the course of the two month period, the mosquito population dropped from an average of 401 mosquitoes per night to about 11 mosquitoes per night (Table 1).  A lot of this decrease is probably due to natural mortality over the summer, but it is also the result of heavy trapping in the area from the Mosquito Magnet®.

 

      A comparison between the Mosquito Magnet® and the ABC Pro® trap was conducted at Downington (Table 2).  From July 2-6 the Mosquito Magnet® trapped 198 Ae. sierrensis per night and zero Cx. pipiens.  The ABC Pro® trap over a 24 hour day period from July 6-7 trapped only 13 Ae. sierrensis, but did trap 34 Cx. pipiens.  The traps were run a second time, the Mosquito Magnet® from July 8-13 and the ABC Pro® trap during July 15-16.  The Mosquito Magnet® again trapped many more Ae. sierrensis at 73 per night, than the ABC Pro® trap, which only trapped 7 in the 24 hour period.  The ABC Pro® trap did catch 66 Cx. pipiens. The Mosquito Magnet® appears to be better suited for use with Ae. sierrensis than the ABC Pro® trap.

 

      An interesting fact about Ae. sierrensis is that the male mosquitoes are attracted to CO2 along with the females.  They do this to find females for mating.  The trap results showed this phenomenon at all three locations (Table 3). At Downington, only 45% of Ae. sierrensis were females.  But, in the ABC Pro® trap, where mostly Cx. pipiens were trapped, 95% of all mosquitoes caught were female. At Gilmer Drive and Bryan Avenue only 59% of mosquitoes, mainly Ae. sierrensis, were females.

 

      One of the main goals in using the Mosquito Magnet® was to give residences some relief from tree hole mosquitoes.  At 1257 Gilmer Drive it seems that this goal was accomplished. This is a notorious tree hole area.  The Mosquito Magnet® was placed in the yard.  Over a three day period, from June 18-21, a total of 156 Ae. sierrensis were trapped. The trap was left another three days and caught 50 more, a big reduction from the previous three nights (Table 4). The Mosquito Magnet® was then taken to a new location.  Telephone calls were made to the owner of 1257 Gilmer Drive, one and two weeks after the last trap day.  With both calls the owner indicated that the Mosquito Magnet® had really helped and that the mosquitoes were under control.

 

Conclusion

 

      The trial of the Mosquito Magnet® by the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District showed that it is an effective tool in helping control tree hole mosquitoes in Salt Lake City.  It by no means got rid of all of the mosquitoes, but it did give people some relief and peace of mind that the mosquito abatement was trying to help.  The trap is easy to use, and once in place requires no maintenance for up to 20 days. It is also environmentally friendly, it uses no pesticide, and it releases no harmful substances. The Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District was happy with the results of the Mosquito Magnet® in the use of trapping tree hole mosquitoes and will continue to use it as a control method.

 


 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 1.    Percentage of complaints due to Aedes sierrensis from 1988-1999.

 


Fig. 2.    Illustration of the counterflow geometry trap and counterflow movement of air through the trap.

 

 

 


 

 



Table 1.     Total number of mosquitoes and number of mosquitoes per day, caught at 1166 Downington street, off and on from June 11 to Aug. 9.

 

Dates

Total

#/Day

June 11-14

1,058

353

June 14-18

1,752

438

June 24-29

858

172

July 2-6

792

198

July 8-9

150

150

July 9-12

177

59

July 12-13

36

36

August 6-9

34

11

 

 

 

Table 2.     Comparison between the Mosquito Magnet® and the ABC Pro® Trap.

 

 

Mosquito Magnet®

ABC Trap

Mosquito Magnet®

ABC Trap

 

 

July 2-6

July 6-7

July 8-13

July 15-16

 

 

 

Aedes

sierrensis

Culex

pipiens

Aedes

sierrensis

Culex

pipiens

Aedes

sierrensis

Culex

pipiens

Aedes

sierrensis

Culex

pipiens

 

# Collected

792

0

13

34

363

0

7

66

 

Avg./Night

198

0

13

34

73

0

7

66

 

 

 

Table 3.     Percentage of female mosquitoes trapped.

 

 

Mosquito Magnet®

ABC Pro® Trap

1166 Downington

45%

95%

1257 Gilmer Drive

59%

 

1709 Bryan Avenue

58%

 

 

 

 

Table 4.     Number of mosquitoes trapped at 1257 Gilmer Drive.

 

 

Male

Female

Total

June 18-21

60

96

156

June 21-24

24

26

50

Total

84

122

206